Low Cost Function Generator Amplifier DIY

Low Cost Function Generator Amplifier DIY


A majority of function generators are only capable of driving a couple hundred milliamps, which is fine for most applications. If you want more output current, you can shell out $400 dollars for a professional signal generator amplifier, or you can do what I did and hack one together for under $40.

A signal generator is an indispensable tool for developing and testing electronic designs. You may find yourself wishing yours could output more current. You could test your power supply design by feeding in a noisy supply voltage, or you could see how it will handle a specific amount of input ripple. If you do this sort of thing on a regular basis, you may want to invest in professional equipment. But, if you are on a budget, or only need this sort of thing occasionally, then keep reading.


When I first started learning electronics in grade school, I had dreams of being able to build anything I wanted. After purchasing components in single quantity from Digi-Key for my first few projects, I learned a disheartening lesson. 

It almost always costs more to make something yourself than to just buy a finished product.

It was then I wrote Tim’s Golden Rule of Building Electronics:

“I shall not build what can be bought unless mine shall be better or cheaper.”

So, before embarking on this project, I checked to see if there were any low-cost units on the market. The least expensive option I could find was the Siglent SPA1010 at just under $400. This unit would work for most cases, but only has a max output current of 1.1Amps, which just wasn’t enough for me.

Screenshot of Siglent SPA1010 purchase page

Figure 1 – Siglent SPA1010

Signal Generator Amplifier DIY

Unable to find a low-cost option, I resolved myself to designing my own signal generator amplifier.

My hope was that I could design the amplifier around a high-power OP Amp. Searching for the highest output OP Amp on Digi-Key revealed the OPA541 and OPA549.

The OPA541 can handle +/- 35V rails, whereas the OP549 can only handle +/- 30V rails.

Since More Voltage = More Better, I went with OPA541.

I felt good about this selection, and I felt even better when I heard on their podcast that the guys at Macrofab were designing a power supply using this same OP Amp. Now, I just needed to whip up a schematic and layout a PCB (with a monster heatsink) to handle the OPA541.

Wait, Tim! Don’t forget about your golden rule!

Before embarking on my design, I decided to see if there were any breakout boards available for the OPA541 (preferably with a heatsink). I couldn’t find anything from the usual suspects (Adafrut, Sparkfun, etc.), but I did find something on Aliexpress.

OPA541 Module on AliExpress

Like most things on Aliexpress, it looked too-good-to-be-true. I found an OPA541 breakout board with free shipping for $35. The OPA541 alone costs almost $22 from Digi-Key in single quantity. So, I ordered one plus a few SMA to BNC cables for $3 each.

OPA541 Module on Digi-Key website

Figure 2 – The OPA541 cost almost $22 in singles

BNC Male Cable on AliExpress

Figure 3 – Inexpensive SMA to BNC cables

A few weeks later, the unit arrived and looked to be as advertised.

Birds-eye view of OPA541 Module

Side view of OPA541 Module

As expected, the amplifier came with zero documentation. The circuit looked simple, so I knew I could reverse engineer it if necessary. Instead, I decided to power it up and see what happened. It was immediately apparent that it used capacitive AC coupling because it only amplified AC signals while ignoring any DC offset applied.

Having nothing to lose, I sent a message to the seller on Aliexpress asking for a schematic. I got back a one-word reply “email”.

Chinese file sharing website

I sent him my email address, and he sent me a link and a password to a Chinese file sharing site which yielded a PDF schematic of the device. Awesome!

Original Chinese schematic of OPA541 module
*Click to enlarge

I noticed values for many components were not correct, so I marked up the schematic to show the actual values. The schematic is a little messy by my standards, but it was easy to see how it works. It is a two-stage amplifier. Both stages are set up as non-inverting with the first having a gain of 3 and the second a gain of 11 for a total gain of 33.

Corrected Chinese schematic of OPA541 module
*Click to enlarge

The most insane thing I discovered was that the first stage OP Amp is an OPA445, a high voltage OP Amp that costs over $10 in single quantity!

OP Amp from Digi-Key

This, plus the OP541 (which costs $21), means I got $31 in chips alone for $35. Assuming these parts are legit, that’s a good deal in my book. Even if the OP Amps are counterfeit, the PCB, heatsink, and connectors are still worth $35 when considering that my alternative was to design and make my own from scratch.

OP Amp for OPA541 module
Figure 4 - OP Amp for OPA541 Module

Below are side-by-side comparisons of the parts from China and ones purchased directly from Digi-Key. They don’t look identical, so I’m not sure if the parts from China are genuine.

Difference in OP Amps OPA541 module from Digi-Key and from China

Difference in OP Amps OPA541 module from Digi-Key and from China

There are two variants of the OPA541AP. One has a G3 suffix. Perhaps this explains the difference between the packages.

If anyone knows more about these ICs, please feel free to write in the comments.

Options for OPA541 modules from Texas Instruments

To allow the device to amplify DC, I replaced C4 and C5 with 0 Ohm resistors. You can see below that C4 has been removed and set aside so a 0 Ohm resistor can be soldered in its place.

Image of OPA541 with replaced C4 and C5 Ohm resistors to allow for DC current

Other Changes

I changed the overall gain to 10 to simplify the mental math required.

To change the gains, I did the following:

  • R2 changed to 10k. Since R1 was already 10k, this set the first stage gain to 2. [1+10k/10k = 2]
  • R4 changed to 2.55k, and R7 changed to 10.2k which set the second stage gain to 5. [1+10.2k/2.55k = 5]
  • Upgraded the main Sanyo brand capacitors with Panasonic 63V rated caps because the original caps were only rated for 35 volts despite the schematic calling for a 50-volt rating.

Upgraded main 34V Sanyo brand capacitors to Panasonic 63V capacitors


Final Schematic

Below is the final schematic including all of my modifications.

DIY Function Generator Amplifier Schematic*Click to enlarge


With the modifications complete, it was time to test the performance.

Modified OPA541 module

I connected the amplifier to our Rigol DP832 and configured the DP832 to provide +/-30 volts as shown in the diagram below.

Amplifier connected to Rigol DP832 with configured DP832 providing +/- 30 volts

For the first test, I fed in a constant DC signal voltage of 2.5 volts. As expected, the amplifier output a constant voltage of 25 volts thanks to our 10x gain. We fed the output to our BK Precision 8600 programmable load and set it to pull 2.9 Amps, which is close to the maximum of 3 Amps for our Rigol DP832 Power Supply. We were able to source over 72 Watts to the programmable load! Sweet!

BK Precision 8600 pulling 2.9 Amps

Our power supply was running close to its maximum output of 3 Amps and supplying 87.7 Watts. Since it was providing 87.7 Watts and our load is pulling 72.3 Watts, the amplifier would have been dissipating the difference between those two values, or 15.4 Watts.

Rigol DP832 Power Supply supplying 87.7 Watts

The thermal image (and the burn on my hand from touching the OPA541) confirms the amp was getting hot.

Thermal Image of OPA541 temperature increase

It got hot but was still operating below its 125˚C limit as shown in the datasheet snippet below:

In order to minimize heat dissipation, we just have to remember to set our power supply voltage just a few volts above our desired max voltage output from the amplifier. This will reduce the voltage differential and hence reduce the power dissipated by the amp.

Next, I connected two 12v automotive light bulbs in series to act as a load and connect our differential Oscilloscope probe across the load.

Two 12v automotive light bulbs in series to act as a load connect differential Oscilloscope probes

I then connected the function generator and set up a 1kHz sine wave set to 2.5 volts peak to peak. 

Function generator set up to 1kHz

Function generator sine wave set to 2.5 volts peak to peak.  

The Oscilloscope shows a ~25-volt peak sine wave at 1kHz as expected.

Picture of Oscilloscope showing 25 volt peak at 1kHz

Below is a video showing the same setup but at 0.5Hz instead.


Overall, I’m quite pleased with my $40 investment. A few weeks of waiting followed by a few minutes of soldering yielded a nice addition to the test bench. It will certainly come in handy for testing future electronic designs.

Learn More About DMC's Custom Hardware and Software Services.


Tim Jager
# Tim Jager

Thanks for your comment. I have the same concern about short circuits so I always run this device from a current limited lab power supply. Our Rigol DP832 can be configured to limit the supply current and it can also shut off the output completely if the current exceeds a configurable threshold. These two features have saved me from destroying expensive electronics on more occasions than I'd like to admit.

I have not extensively tested the high frequency performance of this device, but it would depend on the amplitude of your signal as well as the frequency. I'll post an update next time I use the device with some high frequency signals.
# Mark

A little googling helped me find you - and it seems you have done exactly what I need to do. May I ask a couple of questions please -

First of all, is the amplifier reasonably resilient to low ohm / short circuit conditions or does it need some form of protection as far as you are aware - I don't mean long term / thermal damage, just "oops, didn't mean to do that" shorts for a couple of seconds or so.

Secondly, with the design as you modified it, what sort of frequency does it work up to before starting to really have issues - I am hoping to be able to go to around 300 Khz ideally?

I have tried to find these answers but I am guessing the circuit values have a fair effect on controlling the bandwidth - irrespective of the theoretical max of the IC - and unless the rest of the circuit looks after short circuit conditions, it seems (a little vaguely) that it depends on the voltage of the output signal as to whether it would survive.

I have no intention of deliberately giving it a short circuit but for my use, it will be driving (hopefully) some fairly low impedance coils (1 - 2 ohms hopefully) but I know that every few hours of playing around with test gear, sooner or later I have an "oops" moment.

Hope you have time to answer if you already know - either way thank you for putting this page up - at the very least it is an awesome starting block for others like me.

Kind Regards

Post a comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Enter the code shown above:


Related Blog Posts